-
Website
http://www.taranfx.com/ -
Original page
http://www.taranfx.com/blog/why-bing-sucks-top-5-reasons/ -
Subscribe
All Comments -
Community
-
Top Commenters
-
Rahul
4 comments · 2 points
-
Ramon So
3 comments · 2 points
-
facebook-815279173
4 comments · 1 points
-
maxtorsion
4 comments · 4 points
-
kevinmscs
3 comments · 1 points
-
-
Popular Threads
-
How to Install SnowOSX Universal
3 weeks ago · 68 comments
-
Run Code Online [40+ Languages]
1 day ago · 1 comment
-
Opera 10.5
3 days ago · 2 comments
-
Nexus One vs. iPhone 3GS
1 week ago · 9 comments
-
SpyPhone App Steals Personal Data from ALL iPhones
2 weeks ago · 19 comments
-
How to Install SnowOSX Universal
This invasive piece of doggy doo doo appeared on my screen one day
and I don't have the time or patience , nor a poop scooper to get rid of it.
Please help me, the stench is unbearable. Does anyone have a contact number
to confront the owner(s) of this mess ? I believe his name is Bill Gates.
Thanx, sincerely Andre Marshall
I so agree with what you are saying!
Everytime i try to look up information all i get are a few drips of it and even then its not what i am looking for. This Bing doesnt know me...AT ALL!! I want information...not some tad bit of someones thoughts..I want information..ALL OF IT! I dont want a few sites to pop up because those sites ARE NOT what im looking for...so then i spend hours on bing trying to find the EXACT word or words so that it gives me REAL results.
Bing sucks and thats a shame that people THINK a computer can TELL me what im looking for!!hahahahaha
It has no idea...its always WRONG!! And one or two sites is just plain SLACK. It makes me wonder if some pretty woman came up with an idea and the guys tongues were sticking out instead of their brains. Come on get a grip this sucks...did you people at microsoft even try this out before you sent this out????
If you did..you need a new group of thinkers.
I hate pop-ups of any kind and bing is full of em. Not your average "buy this" pop-ups but stupid "informational" pop-ups.
If I wanted to know about the mating habits of eagles,I would search for that. Bing forces it upon you with a photo homepage and clicky "info" boxes that spawn "info" pop-ups.
I want to hit puppies now. Back to Google for me.
linux
linux windows
linux microsoft
linux vista
I would never use a search engine that blatantly tries to force its corporate self on its users. That's brainwashing mind rape.
“Was Einstein married?” (Google results = just 'Einstein Wife'
“What did Benjamin Franklin invent?” ('Ben Franklin Inventions')
“What is the top selling album of all time?” ('Top selling album all time')
This is a data search.... 'Was', 'What did', and 'What is the' water down your search on strong data collection sites like Google. Askjeeves is gone now, and part of Ask.com... which my mom thinks is a real search engine because you can type sentences in for a search and it kinda acts human or something... I don't know.
But you obviously don't know how to search enough to write an article about the pros and cons of 2 search engines, unless you are talking about search engines for my grandma.
We are comparing Bing to Google. Google is a "search engine" and Bing is a "decision engine." When we use Google, we expect, and receive, search results. Bing gives decision results. Just like all of Microsoft's other products, Bing makes the "decision" of what we can do with our computers. Bing is so innovative that it has blown our minds and we aren't smart enough to interpret its results ;)
I have looked for something and Bing very often doesn't show the results for what I was looking for, or it comes back "not found" . As for Google Its just too big.
and all you get are references to Microsoft products and not anything about glass. Bias?
We're witnessing history here... the slow and subtle decline of a once mighty software giant.
I don't see how they wouldn't have just leveraged the live search engine when creating bing. But it seems they didn't because the result seem to suck.
bing sucks big time when comapred to google is this correct or wrong give me some examples for this question
on google and bing and bing gives only 5 results and are totally unrelevant. But google gives relevant results and many more.
I was expecting a good search/decision engine this time
1. You get a history of what you're searching right in the left menu.
2. The categorization they use, seems quite useful for me.
3. There is also a preview of the content before you go click on it.
Again, this 3 aspects i just listed are really impressive. A few things to take in consideration besides "images and videos"
Not sure either had an ideal list of relevant results, but Bing really annoyed me by first showing an ad for a lightbulb superstore at the top (distracting, and something not found on Google), and the second thing I saw was a result from Microsoft's own Encarta. Sorry, but Encarta is so 1996...who TF uses Encarta in 2009?
Also saw some weird results elsewhere like QOOP photo calendar images giving me high-relevance image search results when I can't image browsing patterns support this, making me believe QOOP has some deal with Microsoft to get their product images high in the search results. This leads to a search engine without any integrity.
I found this annoying and a waste of time, plus I am used to layout of google searches...I know where everything is and I like it that way. I am not switching. Microsoft definetely has the resources, they could have done something truly innovative here...booo!
http://denzuko.wordpress.com/2008/04/18/the-dig...
In all truths, MSFT has died eons ago with the anti-trust wars and is only hanging around because of Vendor licenses, Xbox Licensed Sales, Advertising revenue from PPC and the like.
Really think of it; when was it that you ever really went to the store and bought a copy of Windows, Office, and the like? Never!!! it came with the over priced PC you bought and want to chuck out the window because it stopped working.
Bing is just another example of MSFT's failure to launch something worth wild and leading standards compliant.
Cheers,
Denzuko - denzuko.wordpress.com
apple is wayyyyyyy better
i like imacs
microsoft is really retarded
retards
i am an idiot and no one likes me, and i think they do
and what happed to poor google
i am so dumb buh bye
It is usually ppl like the comfort of what they already have and avoid exploring in the dark.. I am using bling for couple of days and I think it only needs acceptance..
Just by using a search engine for 2 days we can't judge anything... Atleast we need to use the search engine for a month or longer..
Why we have to compare everything with google ?? Yes they set the standards on the web, but we should also let other search engines evolve.. Lets give Bing a fare chance..
http://www.slickit.ca/2009/06/bing-has-arrived....
But, search bing in google....WTF.....
So which search engine is more generous...
Bing, tried it, and don't like any of it. The thumbnail previews on videos being the best bit, yet I generally am always doing something and hoving my cursor back off the video stops the preview. I prefer loading the full thing anyway.
As for all the paging, there is a great Firefox addon called AutoPager which will load the next page of results for just about any site under your current page, very good.
There is also a Greasemonkey script that does this which I used to use.
So paging really should'nt be a problem - even if you are stuck with Internet explorer you could use I.E Pro to install the script.
Microsoft is closely looking at this Blog. All the things that i have been mentioning in the blog, have been being fixed by Bing eventually!
so for all u Bing fans, put ur wishlist here!
amen
google is great
whats up with that gay "bing bang" thing anyway?
whos the idiot that came up with it?
01. My nuts are hot or not?
02. What is my body temperature now?
03. Will I get Swine flu tommorow?
1. No spellcheck on the main page - that is annoying
I guess Jimmy Fallon just sold out
NBC must not be paying out enough
Not only that but do a Google search of "largest hospital near vermont" and the first result is the answer, Bing gives you some radio announcement bullshit
“Wikipedia contains the most relevant info…”
when Google puts the search result of wikipedia at top, its most relevant. As wikip gives inside-out of the topic, it is able to be known as the "best result", coz user finds at-least something concrete to proceed further. wen user gets the building blocks, hes free to go deeper with better keywords for search.
how surprising
http://www.bing.com/search?q=bing+sucks&go=...
hmmm... microsoft tampering with algorithms? never!!
(sarcasm of course)
"google sucks big time when comapred to bing is this correct or wrong give me some examples for this question"
on google and bing and google gives only 5 results and are totally unrelevant. But bing gives relevant results and many more, included this Google adict blog
I have been using the side by side add in on ff, and it shows the list of both.
This feature is the DREADED localization feature. I do a lot of traveling and it always tries to find out where I am to find localized results. I don't need local results, I am planning trips and I need the NON local results. Try setting preferences, and you CAN set to lots of different countries, but you cannot set this to NO localization.
Let's kill localization on the web this is horific for travelers and in the and bad for everybody else!
bing certainly has more precise 'boob' images than google.
Type that into google, and you still have other stuff thrown in image results.
Peace Out!
Yahoo search is better...
AskJeeves is better...
M$ just needs to stick to figuring out how to make an operating system that works on ALL PCs. After that, they can tackle Google's hold on the search engine universe.
Yahoo is better...
AskJeeves is better...
M$ should stick to making their operating systems work. After that, maybe they can try something else.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/scienceandtechnology...
Want a simple test? Just type into both "How tall is Jimmy Stewart". The most relevant answers come from the Google search.
Also, Bing does set Microsoft related issues at the top. When you search for Google, it gives you related sites, and list Bing first. Now, that's marketing.
Bing is used to sell Microsoft and that's just plain wrong.
It did have some features I liked. Like the side bar. Its cool. But, I will never use it again. Sorry Microsoft, it just plain sucks as a search engine and does a poorer job as a decision engine, which is how you are marketing it.
i like socks ><
Thanks Bing for the extremely relevant first result.
http://news.cnet.com/8301-17939_109-10278360-2....
http://www.businessweek.com/technology/content/...
Seems like an army is against the Bing!
Your Wrong.
Google was the first search engine ever
when it was the index system for the first ten webpages ever built.
One of thwe firsts search engine was archie for archive search.
The golden age of PERL
Look here I scanned and uploaded it! http://www.noki.me/images/bing-disease.jpg
Amazing scan dude.
Where did u get tha. You nailed it!
You cannot even compare it to google
There is no comparison between the two
Just saying...
Nah, It wasn't developed in India, here is the real secret http://www.taranfx.com/blog/?p=1072
It was a big challenge for MS.
Screw "bing"
I am beyond mad as there is time sensitive stuff I need to access but I can't cause I get redirected to bing search results about hotmail.
I continually send them feedback. But I doubt they check it.
For instance, one of you said put in "linux" in the search and Microsoft comes up the boxes below for search suggestions saying "linux microsoft, linux windows" etc. That is not true! You are just saying that for shits and giggles. I get everything to come up for linux including command lines, downloads, and the different versions of linux.
You people are hating on Bing simply because it's made by Microsoft and you have no idea how a search engine functions or operates behind the scenes. I also strongly agree with the person who wrote this blog post as well. 100+ search results on a page of Google when only the first 5 are really worth clicking on? You must be using Google for practical searches, but when I search for programming error codes and support, I get jack shit for search results.
I did the same search under Google, and got nothing But the Comedian Louis Black. BING SUCKS.
Which search engine is better that only changing market share can tell... and we are already seeing the change in trend...
FYI: try this! you will be surpise not me but yourself ;)
http://blindsearch.fejus.com/
And for those who believe Google's map and video search are far better, guys give me a break... its okey you wana defame MS for anything they do calling it substandard or whatever. but i think this is overdoing...
Google no doubt was best once upon a time... but it has lived its age and without any business model its growing older faster than any other company! :)
cheers
sunny
bing does NOT work
Much like they have general computing.
I'm still trying to figure out where the little "best time to fly" advert they use is at on or with this search engine. What a piece of shit. What a piece of false advertising. What a great day for my google stock.
This is NOT Microsoft Hatred site. This is the same site that Praises Windows 7 like anything http://www.taranfx.com/blog/tag/windows-7
In fact started several series that support windows 7.
Go and get some life.
Tried Bing for a while, it does suck .................
I have a personal website that is at around position 4 for related key word search on both Google and yahoo search, I submitted my site to Bing, guess what? almost 1 month later my site is no where to be found on Bing.
I can get a higher probability in google with misspelled or unknown therms than bing or even altavista (for power searching i still use metacrawler), these loosely search technique is important because the language is evolving (or crapping, anyway the language is changing) because the marketing campaigns keeps making horrible word jokes popular and the chats are not helping with it neither (u know the kind off wrdz the kidz luv 2 say, lol, etc), so i can get the corrected version from google for the search "Criztoval colo" to get "Cristobal colón", maybe if microsoft uses their office ortogrpahic corrector, but that would sound malicious like microsoft marketing their own anti-virus or selling licensed partner's products as their own (it's just not ethical).